Alice/my_digital_garden
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

vault backup: 2023-09-20 10:21:49

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Alice 2023-09-20 10:21:49 +01:00
parent b0e59ea280
commit 045d0f04b6
1 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
content/RAS/TP - Aula 1.md
View file

@ -71,13 +71,15 @@
>[!help]+ Ex. 3.4 (Naveda and Seidman, 2006, pp. 57–58) >[!help]+ Ex. 3.4 (Naveda and Seidman, 2006, pp. 57–58)
>Which of the following arguments is the most solid/strong to justify the specification of the non-functional requirements of a system? >Which of the following arguments is the most solid/strong to justify the specification of the non-functional requirements of a system?
> >
>1. acceptance/validation procedures >1. The non-functional requirements should only be considered in development contexts subject to tight restrictions (resources, budget, or deadlines).
>2. delivery plans >2. The non-functional requirements are only external characteristics of the system and can be obtained later.
>3. quality attributes >3. If a functionality is present in the system, the non-functional requirements determine how usable and useful it is.
>4. activities to guarantee the quality >4. The non-functional requirements take less time to specify than the functional requirements.
> >
>>[!hint]- Resolução >>[!hint]- Resolução
>>Option 3. is the best justification..
>> >>
>>Non-functional requirements appear to be an enumeration of restrictions to the functional requirements being defined by a developing system. Non-functional requirements are the buffer of quality of the product - these cannot be defined later. Their determination may take even more time
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>