my_digital_garden/4a1s/ASCN/T - Aula 2.md

83 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2023-09-24 14:02:33 +01:00
🌫 18 Setembro 2023 - #ASCN
2023-09-24 12:52:33 +01:00
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
- ## Why distributed systems?
2023-09-24 12:52:33 +01:00
- Modularity, decoupling different concerns.
- Performance.
- Dependability
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
- ## How to distribute?
- ### 1. Monolythic system
2023-09-24 13:07:33 +01:00
- Architecture: [[Monolithic system.excalidraw]]
- Multiple services for multiple targets in the same server
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
- ## 2. Distributed systems
id:: 65120d55-6bed-47db-bd53-cc4f627c33dc
2023-09-24 13:07:33 +01:00
- Main distribution concerns:
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
1. Replication
2. Partitioning
3. Service-orientation
2023-09-24 13:07:33 +01:00
- All of these address scaling out a service/application.
- Not mutually exclusive, can be combined.
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
- ### 2.1 Replication
2023-09-24 13:12:33 +01:00
- Architecture: [[Replication.excalidraw]]
- Multiple copies of the same data and functionality
- Addresses resilience and scale-out
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
- ### 2.2 Partitioning
2023-09-24 13:12:33 +01:00
- Architecture: [[Partitioning.excalidraw]]
- A server is split horizontally (Sharding).
- Addresses scale-out.
- Can be applied to computation, data, ...
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
- ### 2.3 SOA - Service-Oriented Architecture
2023-09-24 13:17:33 +01:00
- Architecture: [[SOA.excalidraw]]
- Addresses scale-out and modularity.
- Example: micro-services.
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
- #### 2.3.1 Microservices
2023-09-24 13:22:33 +01:00
- Each service implements specific functionality.
- Services can scale independently.
- Decomposition may be troublesome: how micro is micro?
- Consistency.
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
- Complex deployment and testing
- ## Distributed architectures
- ### 1. Client-server
2023-09-24 13:27:33 +01:00
- Architecture: [[client-server.excalidraw]]
- Functionality and data are in the server.
- A stub runs embedded in the client.
- The stub is part of the server software package
2023-09-24 13:32:33 +01:00
- E.g., the Web (“protocol” is HTTP)
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
- ### 2. Proxy Server
2023-09-24 13:32:33 +01:00
- Architecture: [[proxy.excalidraw]]
- Multiple servers can be used transparently.
- The proxy is a performance and availability bottleneck.
- E.g. MongoDB
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
- ### 3. Master Server
2023-09-24 13:42:33 +01:00
- Architecture: [[master.excalidraw]]
- Scale out!
- E.g. HDFS
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
- ### 4. Server Group
2023-09-24 13:47:33 +01:00
- Architecture: [[server-group.excalidraw]]
2023-09-24 13:42:33 +01:00
- All servers can process requests.
- Coordination may be necessary.
- Resiliency!
- E.g. ZooKeeper
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
- ### 5. Bus
2023-09-24 13:52:33 +01:00
- Architecture: [[bus.excalidraw]]
2023-09-24 13:47:33 +01:00
- The bus routes messages.
- Participants publish and consume messages to/from the bus.
- Decouples producers from consumers.
- **Flexibility!**
- E.g. Kafka
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
- ### 6. Multi-tier
2023-09-24 13:57:33 +01:00
- Architecture: [[multi-tier.excalidraw]]
- Each server acts as a client of the next tier.
- Allows independent deployment and scaling of different functionality.
- E.g. AS + DBMS:
- “protocol A” == Web (e.g.)
- “Stub B” == Database Driver!
- “protocol B” uses SQL
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
- #### 6.1 State in multi-tier
2023-09-24 14:02:33 +01:00
- Persistent state is harder to replicate and shard.
- Computation is easier to replicate and shard.
- No state in upper tiers:
- Web browser
- Transient / cached state in middle tiers:
- Application server
- Persistent state at lower tiers:
2023-09-25 23:59:20 +01:00
- Database